청원고등학교 로고이미지

RSS 페이스북 공유하기 트위터 공유하기 카카오톡 공유하기 카카오스토리 공유하기 네이버밴드 공유하기 프린트하기
1예 04 서동석
작성자 서동석 등록일 20.07.31 조회수 45

I generally agree with your argument. But I don't agree with a single sentence. 

you said,  "The original purpose of reducing disposable products is disappearing.".

But the whole point of your argument is that tumblers and eco-bags are not being used for environmental protection purposes, not that tumblers and eco-bags are not reducing the use of disposable products. 

The problem is that eco-bags and tumblers are becoming more popular and used as a fashion item, causing environmental destruction, but they still have the effect of reducing the use of disposable products. People don't have to use plastic bags with eco-bags, and people won't have to drink in disposable water bottles with tumblers.

이전글 [1죽18 이혜진] The Another side of Tumbler & Eco-bag (2)
다음글 2020. 제 2회 사이버영어토론대회 (2020. 7.16.~2020. 7. 31.)
답변글