I don't agree with you. First, error of humans and error of robots are very different. Error of humans occurs during work, and its frequency is relatively high. However, error of robots occurs during the manufacturing process of robots, and the frequency is relatively rare. In addition, self-learning robots learn more efficiently and accurately than humans. Therefore, safety is higher than before.

Second, there is no need for anyone to watch the work. Because even the role can be replaced by robots. A system that manages other robots in real time is added, and a system that checks their management functions can be added if necessary. Then, the work can be maintained even if people manage robots once a few years.

Third, the job is a very important problem. But are jobs really necessary? Jobs are just a tool of life, not a goal. When robots are used, production in manufacturing, transportation, and service sectors will be greatly improved. Then supply prices will naturally fall according to the principles of supply and demand, and humans can live a more comfortable and affluent life with less income. Moreover, the income can be obtained through taxes imposed on companies or basic support. In the end, people will enjoy a comfortable life without worrying about jobs.

It is premature to decide the future with the phenomenon of the near future. We can solve the problem and lead a better life. Therefore, I think we should view that positively.