RE:[1매 02 고지윤 ] Fat tax; not a best solution |
좋아요:0 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
작성자 | 이영행 | 등록일 | 17.06.24 | 조회수 | 44 |
I think your reason is very logical. Hmm..but I'm sorry, I cannot uphold your allegation you said that the range of food that be applied fat tax is not clear. . Well, I have a question to you. " Which food is contain more sugar ? Doughnut or apple. I think you will choose Doughnut As you know In general Junk food contain a lot more sugar, salt and fat than others. So your question could not be a problem. (YOUR QUESTION : ‘Should all the sugar or gat containing food be taxed?’ In fat or sugar - containing foods, many of them are nutritional and helpful to our health.) why junk food is harmful is they have be far more sugar and fat than general food!
Fat tax's ultimate purpose is prevent people from sugar monster's world! Therefore your ’unclear range theory’ claim doesn't hold water either. 1매15안지민 |
이전글 | [2128 조재희] A Fat Tax Should Be Implemented (1) |
---|---|
다음글 | [2209 김동윤] Is obesity tax really necessary? |