댓글 11개
최진호
2020.08.09 16:18
2226 최진호 - I agree to some of the methods of creating a purchase record when you purchase a Tumbler. I also partially agree with your QR code system. Since many people buy tumblers and do not use them much, there are many environmental pollution problems compared to paper cups/plastic cups. The solution you suggested to solve this problem was very innovative. But I would like to ask you two things. First, please clearly state the difference between the purchase registration system and the QR code system, and tell us how to improve it more efficiently. In a way the purchase registration system and the QR code system are in no way different from each other. I think that if you can combine these two policies into one policy, it will be very efficient. The reason I ask for this is because I think I can make these two policies into one.
Next, please tell us what you think about the use of the eco-bag. You talked about a solution to the use of tumbler. I'm so curious about your thoughts on how to solve your eco-bag problem.
I'm very curious about your answer to both of the above. Thank you for reading the long reply.
김민찬
2020.08.09 21:51
최진호 :
I don't think the former and the latter you said are the same. First of all, I apologize for not providing a clear basis, but the former is "set an upper limit on the production of a company" and the latter is "inserting a QR code for tumbler production." To set the upper limit, I would like to propose a limit on the volume of carbon dioxide emission transactions and so-called "carbon emission rights" as mentioned in my argument. Of course, if you combine the two as you said, it will create more synergy, but clearly the two arguments are different.
I apologize for not providing a clear basis for the QR code policy. First of all, QR codes is referred to as bar codes in the form of two-dimensional matrices. I'm considering inserting the QR code into the tumbler that covers the outside with acrylic or the tumbler that uses acrylonitrile styrene. Then people don't have to worry about getting peeled off when you wash the dish. In addition, I will set a six-month contract period for the purchase of tumblers and ask each restaurant to provide various special treatment for them. As I mentioned in the text, the paper cups will increase in six months, exceeding the gas growth of the tumblers. Therefore, I am thinking of a 30% discount or membership application for purchasing the drink.
I thought that choosing between a tumbler and an eco-bag during the discussion. I'm sorry. Even if I want to modify it, it will be difficult to be deleted again. I give my opinion in reply. The advantage of eco-bag is that it does not produce greenhouse gases and pollutants such as carbon dioxide when used for a long time compared to plastic bags. But I also present the upper limit and QR code policy. This will be possible because both are likely to function like taxis at first and then as a car. Thank you for reading my answer.
최진호
2020.08.10 13:49
김민찬 :
2226 최진호 - I may not have understood your reply well, but first of all, thank you for your reply. Your opinion that paper cups will catch up with the tumbler's increase in pollutant emissions in six months is certainly credible information, but I disagree with some of this. This information will forever be on the condition that people use Tumblers "frequently". Tumbler is a place where it will be produced more constantly, and people will only collect more of it. I'm going to tell you some interesting information you may know well. As a simple example, there will be a Starbucks tumbler. Stores and institutions such as Starbucks often release tumblers in the form of events. Some people, even a lot of people, try to get as many as about 100 cups of coffee to get it by consuming, even throwing away. And most of them probably already own a Tumbler. As can be seen from this simple example, tumblers are constantly produced and owned. Some without a single use. Due to this problem, I think the environmental pollution of the tumbler is worse, worse, and worse than the paper cup. No one knows what the future will be like in the future, but everyone can face the facts of the present. I think the relationship between paper cup and the increase in pollutant emissions from the tumbler that you think is the future task that the tumbler is used "frequently" and "daily". And, on the contrary, now, when you don't use the tumbler often, may be the present task. Thank you for listening to my opinion
김민찬
2020.08.17 00:32
최진호 :
That's why I told you I put a limit on the production of tumblers. Can you interpret your opinion correctly? And I presented the QR code to give benefit people, not to limit their freedom. So not only is there no risk of infringement of freedom, but it's also a reasonable way to protect nature.
이정진
2020.08.15 22:48
김민찬 : 2719 이정진 - I agree with you. Especially, I was impressed that you suggested a specific way to limit the number of tumbler purchases such as QR codes. And you talked about ways to reduce tumbler purchases by a company that manages the number of tumblers purchased by a buyer. But I wonder if a company whose purpose is to make money by selling a lot of tumblers will try to do the right thing. I think the company itself should reduce tumbler manufacturing in the first place. So, do you think there is a way to properly supervise the company that manages the number of tumblers or to make it possible for the company to voluntarily limit the number of buying the tumblers? Tell me if you have a plan.
김민찬
2020.08.17 00:54
이정진 :
Can we conclude that reducing the use of tumblers is the right thing to do? Of course, environmental aspects may be good, but I also want you to think about the corporate image the company gets from reducing pollution. The image of a company is an asset. The company's image`s goodness or badness unconditionally affects the sales of products. Common sense, wouldn't the diminishing sales revenue from reducing tumbler production be filled by selling drinks and food instead? I think companies may actively consider tumbler restrictions. And I said in my argument that we should limit pollutants including carbon emissions from making tumblers. That's to say, I`m going to apply a specific carbon emission system here. If a company goes beyond the pollutant emission limit institution sets, there will naturally be additional costs, and maybe the company's profits from making tumblers can be greatly reduced, depending on the corporate image I just mentioned. I think this will happen naturally if the state or government actively sets it up as an 'eco-friendly company' and prepares a way to put out a lot of related advertisements. In conclusion, Even if tumbler production is reduced, I think the reduced production will be recovered by selling food(by corporate image).
차민경
2020.08.16 22:45
[2622 차민경] I like your article, especially the quotation of assessment of the entire process of cloth diapers and disposable diapers conducted by the U.K. Department of Environment. Also, measures that we have to put a line on the purchase of tumblers and propose mandatory insertion of tumbler QR codes are novel thoughts. But, I want to ask you one question regarding of using tumblers and eco-bags. I think many people use several tumblers and use them for a short period of time. So It leads to the environmental problems. How do you think about?
김민찬
2020.08.17 01:13
차민경 :
I don't think I can deal with all the people who use tumblers for a short period of time, According to “Jeongchi woa Beob” that we have learned, Cause we can't infringe on ownership and the right to use property freely, right? That's why I set an upper limit on corporate tumbler production, and I insisted on giving consumers benefits if they use it for more than 6 months. Then the company's image will improve, and related sales will increase, right? Of course, consumers can turn into a tumbler collector like crazy, saying, "What the hell is that?" But I've already set a corporate limit on tumblers, and the tumblers may become rare and the prices may go up. Then, my argument is that it may naturally be reluctant to buy tumblers. It may be seen crazy, but thanks to the questions you have raised, I can look at them in other ways, thank you. ;)
PS. I don't want you to raise the question, "Wouldn't people`s preference for paper cups instead of tumblers lead to environmental problems?" My head's already blown and already popped because of another debater like Jin Ho
차민경
2020.08.17 01:41
김민찬 :
[2622 차민경] I would not ask that question because I also argued that it should be used properly. Thank you for your sincere reply to my comment:) Also, the reason from politics and law (Jeongchi woa Beob) was really interesting. Thank you for reminding me of the class. Lastly, setting an upper limit on corporate tumbler production is creative solution!
오윤서
2020.08.16 23:53
[2511 오윤서] I agree with your opinion. Especially, I think it is very creative to suggest 'QR code system'. I like the idea that voluntary participation, not just compulsory methods, will result in long-lasting results.
김민찬
2020.08.17 00:24
오윤서 :
Thank you. I am so grateful that you are the only person who didn`t reject my opinion. I`m crying. I`m soooo happy. Thank you for your compliment
1