이희주 2019.10.30 18:13

(1820이희주) I think your writing has a very solid basis and is persuasive. I completely agree with your idea. Especially, your second reason, ‘the risk of animal desase streaming to humans’ was really interesting. Not only can animals be mentally and physically harmed but humans can also be harmed like skin disease. And to add to my opinion, zoos are not educational for children either. Children develop ‘knowledge’ and ‘personallity’ together. ‘Knowledge’ can learn enough from other media. but in personality, zoos have only a negative effect on children. Given the educational aspect and the health of humans and animals, I agree with the abolition of the zoo system.
김나영 2019.10.30 19:10

(1802 김나영) I think that your argument is logical and reasonable. I stongly agree with your ideas. I'd never thought it about that way. Especially, the first reason, concerns of animal abuse were very impressive. For zoo display, cutting bird's feathers or ligaments is a very wrong behavior. Also, damaging animal's body violates animal's rights. A zoo that was created to protect endangered animals is doing just one of things that are unethical and human-centered.
오윤서 2019.11.01 00:09

[1612 오윤서] After reading your logical writing, I was able to think deeply about this topic. You argued that animals could be used as a means of making money, and said that the facilities could become weak because the zoo lacks funds. After reading your arguments, it was time to think about how to fix this problem. I'm in favor of maintaining the zoo, but I think zoos should evolve in a way where it benefits from other ways not to use the animal as a mean.