이채원 2019.06.19 00:22

[2613 이채원] WHO's decision could have an adverse impact on the game industry. But it is people's health that should be prioritized over the gaming industry. Don't you think so? And your opinion is wrong. Why does classifying game addiction as a disease interfere with treatment? Game addiction is also a mental illness. We go to the hospital to cure diseases. For example, let's say you have a cold. You go to the hospital and get medicine. But does doing so reduce your effort (e.g., drinking a lot of warm water)? I don't think so. Your argument lacks grounds.
이영찬 2019.06.22 20:19

[2424 이영찬]I don't think the game industry is more important than the health of the people, and I just pointed out the confusion that the game industry would bring to the medical community when it was classified as a disease, and I didn't say it would interfere with the treatment. I think you need to read more carefully. And you're overlooking the most important thing. The way to treat game addiction is still not fully developed. Also, if game addiction is classified as a disease, it will not be caused by germs or viruses and therefore will be classified as a non-infectious disease. Non-infectious diseases are difficult to treat. Your idea of classifying game addiction as a disease may be that you are willing to get rid of it in a hurry when you have it. But does classifying game addiction as a disease make it a hasty process? Rather, there have been many cases in which individuals have escaped game addiction due to their own efforts. It is unnecessary to confuse the medical community, and people will blame incompetent medical staff. Your argument is something that can harm people who are tough for nothing Therefore your rebuttal is in vain.