김연구 2019.06.23 15:00

I agree with you in part, but not in whole. You said classifying game addiction as a disease violates human dignity. However, I don't think so. Recently, game addiction has led to the murder of people who have failed to distinguish between virtual reality and reality. If the government does not classify game addiction as a disease, game addicts are more likely to violate the dignity of others.
심준용 2019.06.28 19:29

김연구 : 1의14 심준용 - First of all, I cannot find the contradicting correlation between violating human dignity and classifying game addiction as a disease. So, I want you to mention about it more specifically. Also, you did not explain the reason why the chance of violating the dignity of others increases when we do not classify game addiction as a disease. So, I am asking you for more logical explanation.
이희수 2019.06.23 21:26

I could accept your opinion but I found some logical error. Classification is not legalization. Think about this situation. As you know, cancer is disease, not just disease but very serious time bomb. The cause of cancer is various. Then, should we legalize all of causes of cancer like smoking, exposure of radiation, and so on? Disease is just disease not legality. You have right to playing, but adequate always exist. Classification's role is regulate too much playing not just regulate blindly. They would find proper common ground ensuring gamer's right and human dignity.
심준용 2019.06.28 19:50

이희수 : 1의14 심준용 - It was a keen opinion, but I have mentioned the legalization because people who enjoy games would not be able to play game comfortably, not because it would be prohibited. What I wanted to say is that if game is classified as a disease, people who enjoy game would not be able to play games only concentrating in it concerning the sights of others. This means the invasion of their liberties, and leads to violation of human dignity.